Pages

Friday, June 29, 2012

WORLD REPORT 2012 –AQUINO ADMINISTRATION






It’s just one more promise unfulfilled by President Noynoy Aquino, two years after he assumed office. But Aquino’s failure to arrest and prosecute even one suspected human rights violator for incidents that took place during his term is really getting to be embarrassing.
DO READ PLEASE FOR ADDITIONAL INFO:


WORLD REPORT 2012 –AQUINO ADMINISTRATION

====================================
World Report 2012: Philippines
The Philippines is a multiparty democracy with an elected president and legislature, a thriving civil society sector, and a vibrant media. Several key institutions, including the judiciary and law enforcement agencies, remain WEAK and the military and police STILLcommit human rights violations with impunity. Armed opposition forces, including the communist New People’s Army (NPA) and various Islamist Moro groups, also commit abuses against civilians.
*****A.) Extrajudicial Killings and Enforced Disappearances
Hundreds of leftist politicians and political activists, journalists, and outspoken clergy have been killed or abducted .The government has largely failed to prosecute military personnel implicated in such killings, even though strong evidence exists in many cases. Only seven cases of extrajudicial killings from the past decade have been successfully prosecuted, none of which were in 2011 or involved active duty military personnel.Politically motivated killings have continued despite President Aquino’s pledges to address the problem. Human Rights Watch has documented at least seven extrajudicial killings and three enforced disappearances for which there is strong evidence of military involvement since Aquino took office in June 2010.
*****B.)Private Armies

Aquino campaigned on promises to dismantle the “private armies” of politicians and wealthy landowners, which have long been responsible for serious abuses. While Interior Secretary Jesse Robredo has claimed the Aquino administration has dismantled almost half of the private armies in the southern island of Mindanao, he has not presented any evidence. Promises to revoke Executive Order 546, which local officials cite to justify the provision of arms to their personal forces, also have not come to fruition. Aquino still defends the use of poorly trained and abusive paramilitary forces to fight NPA insurgents and Islamist armed groups. In October Aquino announced the deployment of additional paramilitary personnel to provide security to mining companies.

The trial of senior members of the Ampatuan family for the November 23, 2009 massacre of 58 political opponents and others, including more than 30 media workers, in Maguindanao in Mindanao, is ongoing.

***** C.)Torture

The police and the military were implicated in numerous incidents of torture in 2011. While several investigations are ongoing, the rigor of investigations varies and at this writing no one had been convicted under the 2009 Anti-Torture Act.

In September the Department of Justice filed charges of torture against a Manila precinct chief, Senior Inspector Joselito Binayug, and six others, including one of his superiors, after a cell phone video was circulated in March 2010 showing Binayug pulling on a rope tied around a criminal suspect’s genitals and beating him during the interrogation. The whereabouts of the victim, Darius Evangelista, remain unknown.

On July 23 in Sumisip, Basilan army scout rangers arrested 39-year-old baker Abdul-Khan Balinting Ajid as an alleged member of the Abu Sayyaf armed group. Soldiers allegedly stripped him naked, sexually assaulted him, and set him on fire. While the military said several soldiers involved had been relocated to Manila, the capital, and restricted to barracks, at this writing no criminal charges had been filed against them.

*****D.)Targeted Killings of Petty Criminals and Street Youths

So-called death squads operating in Davao City, Tagum City, and other cities continue to target alleged petty criminals, drug dealers, gang members, and street children. Aquino’s administration has not acted to dismantle such groups, end local anti-crime campaigns that promote or encourage unlawful use of force, or prosecute government officials complicit in such activities. At this writing the National Commission on Human Rights had still not reported on the outcome of multi-agency task force investigations into summary killings in Davao City in 2009.

*****E.)Conflict in Mindanao

A ceasefire remains in place between the Philippine government and the Moro Islamic Liberation Front, and peace talks are ongoing. The army continues to fight Abu Sayyaf, an armed group implicated in numerous attacks on and abductions of civilians, particularly in Sulu and Basilan.

***** F.)Conflict with the New People’s Army

Military clashes continue between government forces and the NPA, especially in the Eastern Visayas, Negros, and parts of Mindanao.

The NPA has unlawfully killed and detained civilians and extorted “taxes” from individuals and businesses. NPA leaders have often sought to justify targeted killings by noting that “people’s courts” earlier condemned those killed for “crimes against the people.” For instance, the NPA killed Raymundo Agaze in Kabankalan City, Negros Occidental on August 19, and Ramelito Gonzaga in Mindanao on September 2 following “people’s court” rulings. Philip Alston, former United Nations special rapporteur on extrajudicial executions, concluded that the NPA’s court system “is either deeply flawed or simply a sham.”

The Philippine army fabricated stories that several children taken into military custody were NPA rebels. In several cases investigated by Human Rights Watch, the army paraded the children in front of the media, publicly branding them rebels despite conclusive contrary evidence. In two of the cases, the army detained the children for several days.

The UN Children’s Fund has documented the use of children in armed conflict by the NPA and the Moro Islamic Liberation Front, as well as by government forces. The UN has reported a rising trend of government security forces using schools as barracks and bases in contravention of national legislation prohibiting such practice.

 *****G.)Reproductive Rights

Contraceptives, including condoms, are restricted in parts of the Philippines, which prohibits and criminally punishes abortion without exception. The law leaves open the possibility that a serious threat to a pregnant woman's life could be classified as a justifying circumstance barring criminal prosecution. However, the Philippine Supreme Court has yet to adjudicate this possibility, which does little to mitigate the serious consequences of criminalizing abortion for women's health and lives.

Despite vehement opposition from the Catholic Bishops’ Conference of the Philippines, Aquino has remained publicly committed to a reproductive health bill that aims to provide universal access to contraception and maternal health care. The bill goes some way toward enhancing protection of sexual and reproductive rights and the right to the highest obtainable standard of health, but still makes abortion a criminal offense. At this writing it remained before Congress.

***** H.)Philippine Workers Abroad

Approximately two million Filipinos work abroad, and in the first nine months of 2011 sent home an estimated US$13 billion. Hundreds of thousands of women work in Southeast Asia and the Middle East as domestic workers, where they are typically excluded from labor laws and are often subject to abuses including unpaid wages, food deprivation, forced confinement in the workplace, and physical and sexual abuse. In 2011 the Philippine government either proposed or implemented bans on sending workers to countries with high incidences of abuse. These bans have largely been ineffective, with host countries turning to other labor sources instead. The Philippines has yet to extend labor protections to household workers domestically, but played a key role globally by chairing negotiations for the International Labour Organization Convention on Decent Work for Domestic Workers, adopted on June 16, 2011.

***** I.)Key International Actors

The United States is the Philippines’s most influential ally and, together with Australia and Japan, among the country’s largest bilateral donors. The US military has access to Philippine territory and seas under a Visiting Forces Agreement, and the two militaries hold annual joint exercises. In fiscal year 2011-2012 the US government appropriated $12 million to the Philippines under Foreign Military Financing for procurement of US military equipment, services, and training. Of this sum, $3 million is contingent upon the Philippine government showing progress in addressing human rights violations, including ending extrajudicial killings. US Ambassador Harry Thomas, Jr. has publicly called on the Philippine government to do more to end impunity for extrajudicial killings

*ADDITIONAL INFO ABOUT INTERNATIONAL RESERVES*


*ADDITIONAL INFO ABOUT INTERNATIONAL RESERVES*





What are “international reserves”, and how did the Philippines end up with $77billion worth of them?

International reserves are external assets that represent the gross claims of the central bank on non-residents of the Philippines. They generally include the country’s gold bullion holdings, foreign currency deposits, securities in which the central bank has invested (such as other countries’ bonds), IMF special drawing rights (SDRs), and its reserve deposits with the IMF. Except for the gold – about 165 tons in all, worth around $8.2 billion at current prices – and a relatively small amount of actual foreign currency deposited at the BSP, most of the reserve assets do not physically exist, and a part, perhaps even most, of the gold reserves are not actually in the Philippines.

The reserves accumulate over time, mostly through foreign currency exchange. When banks trade their foreign currency deposits for pesos at the BSP, a small percentage is retained by the central bank in much the same way the rate you are given for trading your dollars, yen, or euros at the local currency exchange allows the money changer to make a little bit for the trouble. In addition, the foreign currency actually deposited with the BSP by banks as part of their required reserve deposits can be counted as international reserves.

The country has chronic budget deficits and still has a huge foreign debt. Can’t the government use its reserves to make up these shortfalls?

No, because it would create even more disastrous economic problems. The main uses for the reserves are to pay foreign obligations of the government, to back the value of the peso, and to back the reserve deposits of the banks and other government institutions, and all these functions must be carefully balanced. If, for example, the BSP transferred several billion dollars’ worth of the reserves to the Treasury for use in the national budget, the value of the peso would drop sharply, i.e., the number of pesos that could be exchanged for a dollar would increase. Since the country imports significantly more than it exports, inflation would increase; also, the cost of paying the country’s foreign debt would increase dramatically.

What’s an SDR?

An SDR is a sort of voucher used by the IMF and its members (188 countries, including the Philippines, are members of the IMF) as a medium of exchange; it is not exactly a currency, but can be used much like a form of currency in transactions between IMF members. The value of the SDR is calculated from a formula based on the value of the US dollar, the Euro, the Japanese yen, and the Pound sterling, and fluctuates daily; as of June 28, one SDR was worth $1.51.

By the IMF’s own definition, an SDR represents a potential claim against the freely useable currency of a member state. For example, when the Philippines uses an SDR as payment of a foreign debt, it is handing the creditor nation an IOU for an equivalent amount in “freely useable currency,” which usually means dollars, yen, euros, or pounds, unless another agreement between the two countries is made. The $1 billion the government has pledged to “loan” the IMF is denominated in SDRs, and so is worth about 662.3 million SDRs; or if you prefer, 662.3 million IOUs against the country’s foreign currency reserves.

Why does the Philippines have to be part of the IMF? Can’t we do without it?

Realistically, no. The IMF is arguably a deeply-flawed concept and there are good reasons to debate the value of its existence, but at this point bailing out of it would be a very bad idea. The Philippines’ ability to access credit would be severely restricted; even if the country is not borrowing from the IMF, its reserve position in the IMF serves as collateral, or at least a credit reference, for the loans it takes from other countries. Dropping out of the IMF would also complicate transactions with countries whose currencies are not freely-exchangeable with the peso (that is, most of the world).

Well, okay, so we’re stuck with it. Is there any benefit to “loaning” the IMF $1 billion?

In practical terms, virtually none at all. The proposed European bailout package is worth $430 billion, so the Philippines is contributing 0.23% of that. That is not really even worth pogi points, because the Philippines has a 0.43% membership stake in the IMF; from a certain perspective, the country is actually slacking off in doing its fair share. The assertion by the Administration that it will be a positive signal to investors is likewise a weak attempt to blow sunshine up everyone’s skirt. There is nothing about the IMF contribution that indicates positive fundamentals that investors look for: sound business and physical infrastructures, competitive labor availability, and access to markets – the very sorts of things, in other words, that encouraged Ford Motor Company to yank the plug on the Philippines and spend over $1 billion on new factories in Thailand and China.

So what’s the downside?

Again, not much. The drop in international reserves as a result of transferring $1 billion off the books will lower the value of the peso a bit; some analysts have lately said it might reach 45 to $1 by year’s end, and that might be a reasonable estimate. On the other hand, the BSP – which is obsessive about controlling the peso’s value – is probably aware of the implications and will probably do something about them, so I would expect the peso to land somewhere in the mid-43’s. Provided, of course, that any of the other hundreds of sometimes nebulous factors that affect the value of the currency do not happen, which would be a rather unrealistic assumption.
===========================

SO THE BOTTOM LINE IS…?

If you find the $1 billion “loan” to the IMF upsetting, you should build a bridge and get over it. If there’s anything to be upset about, it’s that N/A has, once again, heralded an irrelevant action as doing something progressive. It’s not necessarily a bad move, but it’s not helping to improve this country, either. Waste enough time, and pretty soon there will be no more time left.

$77 BILLION DOLLARS RESERVED FUNDS( PHILIPPINES)



YUNG MGA NATUTULOG AT NABULAGBULGAN SA KATOTOHANAN

DO READ PLEASE!

***** $62.9 B FOREIGN DEBT ng Pilipinas 1st quarter ng 2012, at may 3.3 % pagtaas mula sa dating $60.9 B sa parehong panahon ng 2011, ayon sa BSP, noong katapusan ng September 2011, $62.4 B ito. Batay naman sa tantiya ng NSCB, "every Filipino owed 51,675 pesos (1,200 U.S dollars), to domestic and foreign creditors." UTANG?! NOW , $1 B US dollars nais IPAUTANG NI BS Aquino sa International Monetray Fund o IMF. ANU MASASABI NIYO NIAN! <>...

ASAN ANG SINASABING RESERVED FUNDS! Eh kung meron man at sinasabing for INTERNATIONAL TRADE purposes ang FUNDS na yan hindi pwede gamitin sa development ng BANSA?

ITO ANG MGA KATANUNGAN KO?

Ang $77-bilyong reserve fund daw ng Pamahalaan na nasa Bangko Sentral..

Tandaan ninyo, mga kababayan, ang pinaguusapan natin dito ay $77 bilyon o mahigit sa P3 TRILYONG PISO. IILAN lang ang nakakaalam at may control sa halagang ito.

WALA TAYONG KATIBAYAN na walang NAKAWANG NANGYAYARI sa naturang pondo.

Tanging salita lamang ng IILANG nilalang sa gobyerno ang naririnig natin. Ngunit hindi tayo nakasisiguro kung tutoo lahat ang sinasabi o sasabihin nila.

Apart from these, we practically don’t know the following:
A): Has it been ever used for its purpose? If so, when and for what? Where are the supporting papers for the disbursement?

B): Have the people, especially the poor, directly benefitted in any way from the $77-billion? If yes, when and how? If no, why not?

C): Is that fund audited? If yes, when was it last audited and what are the findings? Has there been any official certification from anyone that no plunder or any other anomaly has been committed so far with the fund?

D): If the fund is not audited, why? What is our guarantee that nothing is being stolen from it?

E): What is the procedure (s) in releasing money from the fund? Are there built-in steps against theft in handling the money?
So here’s hoping that nobody will take the $1-billion lent to the IMF as lightly as any other daily event.

******Foreign debt rises to $62.9 B in 1st quarter
(philstar.com) Updated June 22, 2012 09:05 PM

The Philippines' foreign debt increased by $1.2 billion to $62.9 billion on the back of higher investments in January to March, the country 's central bank said today.

"The increase is due largely to the $2.3 billion net availments (excess of borrowings over repayments) as investment and business activities by both the public and private sector entities escalated due to the upbeat business sentiment," said the Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas (BSP) in a statement.

Despite the increase, the BSP said the country's external debt as of end-March remains manageable.

The Philippine central bank said the external debt ratio which indicates solvency and the country's capacity to repay foreign obligations over the long term improved to 20.7 percent, from 22.2 percent a year ago.

http://www.philstar.com/Article.aspx?articleId=820043&publicationSubCategoryId=200

Philippine external debt ratio goes down but total foreign debt rises http://www.mysinchew.com/node/74720

Philippine foreign debt rises to $62.4B at end-Sept
Reuters
Posted at 12/29/2011 4:05 PM | Updated as of 12/30/2011 8:23 AM
MANILA, Philippines - The country's outstanding foreign debt climbed 1.6% at the end of September from end-June as a result of the weaker US dollar against the yen, the central bank said on Thursday.
More than four-fifths of the total foreign debt of $62.4 billion carried maturities longer than one year, with the weighted average maturity at 22.4 years. The remainder were debts of one year and below, made up largely of interbank borrowings and trade-related obligations.
Public sector debt comprised more than three-fourths of the total, with more than two-fifths of total debt coming from multilateral institutions and bilateral creditors. More than a third of creditors are foreign holders of Philippine sovereign bonds and the rest are financial institutions and foreign suppliers.

GISING MGA KABABAYAN HUWAG MAG BULAGBULAGAN, HINDI NINYO NAPANSIN GARAPALAN ANG PAMBOBOLA NI BS AQUINO!

NGAYON SABIHIN MAY PERA ANG PILIPINAS! ASAN?

BUTI PA SIGURO ANG SAGOT NG ISANG ESTUDYANTE NA ITO, BAGAMAT ITO ISANG JOKE LAMANG PERO MAY KATOTOHANAN!




tsk>>tsk>>>tskkk

Thursday, June 28, 2012

THERESA BONOAN-DAVID






OFWs, family members & migrant workers’ advocates: let us stop this another state money-making scheme! Shame on the law-maker(s) proposing said bill ~ gigisahin na naman ninyo kami sa sarili naming mantika! What happens to our OWWA membership fee amounting to $25 per OFW, and the assistance to nationals (ATN) welfare/legal fund for OFWs in need? What happens to the contractual obligation of employers and accountability of the agencies? Most importantly where's the accountability & responsibility of the Philippine government? What a shame!

"Remittances from overseas-based Filipinos reached $1.7 billion in April, up 5.3 percent from $1.62 billion in the same month last year. This brought the inflows for January to April to $6.5 billion, which was 5.4-percent higher than the $6.2 billion sent in the same period of 2011." MALAKING PERA FROM THE SWEAT & BLOOD OF OFWS.

"In terms of territories from where the funds were sent through banks, the top 10 sources were the United States, Canada, Saudi Arabia, Japan, the United Kingdom, the United Arab Emirates, Singapore, Italy, Germany, and Hong Kong." MEANING THE LABOUR EXPORT POLICY OF PNOY IS UP TOTHE HILT!

PHILHEALTH CIRCULAR NO. 022





OFW- MAGTULUNGAN TAYO!

MAY MGA BENIPISYO NGA ANG PHILHEALTH, PERO HINDI MAKATARUNGAN NA MAGKAKAROON NAMAN NG INCREASE!


MY REACTIONS AFTER I FINISHED REVIEWING THE SAID MANDATORY IMPLEMENTATION OF ANNUAL PHILHEATH CONTRIBUTION FOR OFW:

http://www.philhealth.gov.ph/circulars/2011/circ22_2011.pdf

1,200 pesos increase effective July 01,2012
2,400 pesos increase effective January 01,2013


“Scrap Philippine Health Circular No. 022 – this is about the increase of PhilHealth annual premium contribution from P900 to P2,400 which will effect on January 1, 2013.




PhilHealth Circular No. 022 will Kill OFWs Softly

“The hike in OFWs health insurance premium will not only bleed us(OFWs and dependents) dry, it also sucks out our blood leading ‘to death due to deprivation of free and affordable social services’. The government through various agencies is killing us so softly by imposing additional fees in pretense of better social services."

The said PhilHealth Circular No. 022 is against the REPUBLIC ACT No. 10022 – AN ACT AMENDING REPUBLIC ACT NO. 8042, OTHERWISE KNOWN AS THE MIGRANT WORKERS AND OVERSEAS FILIPINOS ACT OF 1995, AS AMENDED, FURTHER IMPROVING THE STANDARD OF PROTECTION AND PROMOTION OF THE WELFARE OF MIGRANT WORKERS, THEIR FAMILIES AND OVERSEAS FILIPINOS IN DISTRESS, AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES.

Under the RULE XVII: MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS – Section 4. Government Fees, Administrative Costs and Taxes. All fees for services being charged by any government agency on migrant workers prevailing at the time of the effectivity of this Rule shall not be increased. This RA No. 10022 was officially approved and signed by the former president Gloria Macapagal Arroyo on March 08, 2010.




I searched out the names of the Board of Directors of PhilHealth to know if the said PhilHealth Circular No. 022 is approved by all the board of directors. Out of 14 members only one has affixed his signature to PhilHealth Circular No. 022 in the named of Dr. Eduardo P. Banzon and the other name who also signed her signature was not in the list or not in the list of Executive Officers. The PhilHealth Board of Directors are as follows:

Board Chair: Hon. Enrique T. Ona, M.D.
CSC Chairman: Hon. Francisco T. Duque III, M.D., MSc
DILG Secretary: Hon. Jesse M. Robredo
DSWD Secretary: Hon. Corazon J. Soliman
DOLE Secretary: Hon. Rosalinda D. Baldoz
Health Care Providers Sector: Hon. Juan M. Flavier, M.D.
Labor Sector: Hon. Alexander A. Ayco, M.D.
Employers Sector/President and Chief Executive Officer: Hon. Dr. Eduardo P. Banzon
Self Employed Sector: Hon. Francisco Vicente F. Lopez M.D.
SSS President & CEO: Hon. Emilio S. De Quiros, Jr.
GSIS President & General Manager: Hon. Robert G. Vergara
NAPC-BS Vice Chairman: Hon. Florencia P. Cabatingan
Filipino Overseas Workers: Hon. Jane M.N. Sta. Ana
Corporate Secretary: Atty. Genesis M. Adarlo

PLEASE SHARE TO ALL OFW, UNTIL IT WILL REACHED OUT TO THEM….

GLORIA MACAPAGAL ARROYO







Gloria Macapagal Arroyo Sold Our National Sovereignty To China - China’s Intrusions Are Connected To Gloria Arroyo’s Deals

The current word war between the Philippines and China is another proof of the continuing curse of Gloria Arroyo on the Filipino people.

The latest series of diplomatic protests lodged by the Philippines with China and submitted also to the United Nations have its roots to the controversial Joint Marine Seismic Undertaking entered into by the Arroyo government with China in 2005 which allowed China and later on Vietnam to explore not only the Philippine-occupied islands in the disputed mineral-rich Spratlys but areas that are clearly Philippine territory.

The JMSU was initialed during Gloria Arroyo’s 2004 visit to China which paved the way for the signing of at least two graft-riddled deals : North Rail and national broadband network with ZTE agreements.

Last March, the Philippines filed a diplomatic protest when two Chinese patrol boats intruded into Reed Bank in Western Palawan where a seismic survey is being conducted by the Department of Energy with a private firm. The Philippine Navy in Western Command had to come in and drove away the Chinese ships in what Philippine officials assert as “Philippine territory.”

It was followed by a much-delayed protest last April by the Philippines over China’s nine-dash line map submitted to the United Nations Commission on the Limits of the Continental Shelf. China’s map, submitted to the U.N on May 7, 2009 supports their claim that the whole South China belongs to them including the Spratly islands which are being claimed in part by the Philippines, Vietnam, Malaysia, Brunei and Taiwan.

This month, the Philippines again protested the discovery on Amy Douglas that the Chinese have erected a number of steel posts and placed a buoy near the breaker of the bank also known as Iroquois reef. The Philippine Navy reported that Chinese ships were seen unloading building materials.

The Philippine Navy had removed the posts and the buoy.

After the Amy Douglas protest, the Philippines again filed another diplomatic protest over a February 2011 incident when two Philippine fishing vessels were fired upon by Chinese warships at Jackson Atoll. The fishermen sought the help of the Philippine Navy which accompanied them back to the area to retrieve their anchors.

The Navy reported seeing Chinese fishermen exploiting the marine resources in the area.
Philippine officials said all the areas that Chinese armed ships intruded lately were within the Philippines 200 nautical miles Exclusive Economic Zone. The Chinese, on the other hand, asserted its ownership over areas covered by the South China Sea.
This prompted the Philippines to adopt the term “West Philippine Sea” referring to the same areas in the same manner that Vietnam refers to the same area as East Asia Sea. (India, by the way, does not claim ownership of the Indian Ocean.)

Foreign Secretary Albert del Rosario and Defense Secretary Voltaire Gazmin are alarmed by the latest pattern of intrusions.

They don’t want another Mischief Reef to happen. In 1995, the Philippines discovered military-type structures on Mischief Reef, 150 nautical miles west of Palawan and 620 nautical miles southeast of China.

Despite Philippine protest, China never left Mischief Reef and has even expanded its fortifications in the island complete with h parabolic antennas and machine guns.
There’s another thing that concerns the Aquino government.

When Del Rosario met with the Chinese Embassy charge d’affaires last May 31 over the Amy Douglas intrusion, he conveyed the Philippine government’s concern over reports in Chinese state media about China’s planned installation of its most advanced oil rig in the South China Sea next month.

Diplomatic sources said China’s planned oil exploration is related to the JMSU which was not continued after the first phase because of questions of legality (the case is still pending with the Philippine Supreme Court) because the project included areas that were not disputed. Under the Constitution, “exploration, development, and utilization of natural resources shall be under the full control and supervision of the State.”

To go around the constitutional prohibition, the government changed the word “exploration” to “seismic survey.”

The initial exploration/ seismic survey to find out how much resources are there in the area. Based on the results, the Philippines, China, and Vietnam are supposed to jointly develop the resources. The Chinese provided the ships, Vietnam the scientists and the Philippines interpreted the data gathered.

With the information gathered from the survey, it was expected that development of the area would proceed. China’s recent moves are seen as moving to the next phase of the project.The Philippines government, on the other hand, is stopped by questions on the legality of the project.

Under the JMSU, Reed Bank, said to contain about 3.4 trillion cubic feet of natural gas and 440 million barrels of oil, is included. The Philippines now insists it is Philippine territory and not part of the disputed areas.
Oppositors to the JMSU had expressed concern that by entering into the project, the Philippines surrendered sovereignty over the resource-rich area and strengthened China’s claim over it.

There were allegations that the Arroyo government’s sell-out of Philippine sovereignty in West Philippine Sea was connected to a number of multi-million Chinese loans for projects that became riddled with graft and corruption.
That’s one of the crimes of Gloria Arroyo against the Filipino people.

Research:

Delmar Nur Faramarz Ferdowsi Salah Ad-Din Tomasa Gomez de Molina Costa Sanchez de Cassa Fajardo Lopez Roldan Martinez Simarro Mondejar del Castillo Balera Chumilla Portal Ynarejos Ramos de Losa del Pozo Africa Bautista Rubio-Escrivano Bucad Calaycay Alcaraz “RAPASAKDALSAKAY” Topinio Taclibon

JOSEPH ESTRADA






Charges filed

A few months after the January 2001 popular uprising that ousted Estrada, the Philippine Ombudsman filed two charges at the Sandiganbayan on April 4, 2001; one for plunder and the other for perjury. The plunder case consisted of four separate charges: acceptance of 545 million pesos from proceeds of jueteng, an illegal gambling game; misappropriation of 130 million pesos in excise taxes from tobacco; receiving a 189.7-million-peso commission from the sale of the shares of Belle Corporation, a real-estate firm; and owning some 3.2 billion pesos in a bank account under the name Jose Velarde. The minor charge of perjury is for Estrada underreporting his assets in his 1999 statement of assets and liabilities and for the illegal use of an alias, namely for the Jose Velarde bank account.
Estrada's son, Jinggoy Estrada, an incumbent senator, and Edward Serapio, his personal lawyer were his co-accused. Also charged were Charlie Ang, Yolanda Ricaforte, Alma Alfaro, Eleuterio Tan, Delia Rajas, and Jaime Dichaves, who was later added.
[edit]Arraignment and plea
.....
[edit]Prosecution's case
The Philippine government's prosecution team was led by Special Prosecutor Dennis Villa-Ignacio and other government lawyers. Their case against Joseph Estrada was based on the following:
[edit]Defense's case
Former President Joseph Estrada's defense panel, led by Atty. Estelito Mendoza, and composed of former Supreme Court justices and other celebrated Philippine lawyers based their defense on the following points:
President Estrada recalls the Arroyos plotting with the civil society and the military in January 2000, to take over a year later; The House of Representatives impeaching him without debate and voting; The Senate blue-ribbon committee not hearing him out; The Impeachment Court not citing for contempt the losers in a democratic debate and voting; and the Supreme Court conniving with the elite to swear in then-Vice-President Gloria Arroyo at noon of January 20, 2001, -(Manila Times, September 30, 2007)
1. The whole process is against the constitution. a) the legal possibility of removing a sitting president is by impeachment. Paguia, one of Estradas lawyers argues ,Former President Estrada was not convicted and removed by the Senate acting as an Impeachment Court, . Therefore it is unconstitutional to subject him to the jurisdiction of the Sandiganbayan.“ -(Manila Times, September 14, 2007)
b) the Supreme Court relied on a biblical, not constitutional passage, with President Estrada still in the Palace
c) the same Court created a special division for President Estrada (not done in the case of the Marcoses and the cronies and the military).
d)Actually, the plot to oust President Estrada was planned by the then-Vice president Arroyo who met with some political and religious leaders calling for a what she called "Transition Government" under her rule.
2. The Sandiganbayan did not find him guilty of stealing a single centavo of public money. (Manila Times, September 30, 2007)
Lead counsel Estelito Mendoza insisted there is no evidence Estrada received bribe money from jueteng lords. There was also no evidence he received commission money or checks from the Belle transactions. The one who admitted to receiving bribe money from gambling lords was former governor Chavit Singson of Ilocos Sur. But he was not charged as a co-conspirator. He ran for senator in May 2007 but lost.
3. Fabrication of evidence: Manrique, a former action officer of the Volunteers Against Crime and Corruption (VACC) , narrated in his affidavit how he, sometime in the last week of October 2001, was contacted by a lawyer(State Prosecutor Dennis Villa-Ignacio) who represented himself as a member of the prosecution team in the Estrada cases.
Manrique said the lawyer convinced him to file another perjury case against the deposed president since the original case filed by the Ombudsman was deemed to be weak and insufficient in evidence. The lawyer added Manrique’s complaint against Estrada had to be antedated to make it appear that even before the Ombudsman had filed his own case,
4. Saguisag, one of Estrada‘s lawyers said the defense will base its legal argument on the prosecution’s failure to indicate in the information that Estrada had received jueteng money “by reason of his public office,” “There was no allegation that it was received by reason of his public office. That’s one of the elements of plunder,” (inquirer, September 2007)
5. The Sandigan special graft court has an image problem. It is not perceived as being impartial or independent or even fair. Reynato Puno has one of the worst trust ratings for a public figure. (Manila Times September 12, 2007)

BENIGNO S .AQUINO III






The supposed continued popularity of Noynoy Aquino is HIGHLY DOUBTFUL. Even if the country’s leading survey firms, the Social Weather Stations (SWS) and Pulse Asia say so.

Consider these, among others, people:

1. For the past several months, NOT EVEN ONE big and NEUTRAL group from any sector has declared continued support for Noynoy despite his Administration’s blunders. The only exception I know of is the Black and White Movement, of which Presidential Spokesman Edwin Lacierda is one of the top officials.
2. The youth sector has been protesting and openly expressing disappointment over the budget cuts for education.
3. Judges have openly protested cuts in the Judiciary budget and the impeachment of Chief Justice Renato Corona.
4. The business sector has been repeatedly complaining about sky-high electricity rates. Several weeks ago, I came across a news item saying that the biggest organization of exporters in the country has warned that a lot of its members will close shop if the cost of electricity won’t go down.
5. The public as a whole has been tirelessly denouncing uncontrollable increases in the prices of food and basic commodities.
6. Some of the top officials of Pulse Asia are relatives of Noynoy.
7. Surveys on Noynoy’s supposed popularity come out, curiously, right after a major blunder by his Administration and public outrage.
8. Never has Pulse Asia or SWS come out with a detailed explanation on how can the supposed 1,000 plus respondents to their surveys represent the sentiments of us 80 million plus Filipinos.

Anybody can correct me if I’m wrong on anything.

If anybody can justify the supposedly continued overwhelming popularity of Noynoy despite these observations. I assure you I’ll come out with it right away. Just be sure you’ll have supporting details.

I am citing Noynoy’s questionable popularity, people, because it aims to condition our minds into BLIND ACCEPTANCE of his actions and performance.

It’s a way of telling us “Noynoy’s popular because he’s doing well as President,” even if signs to the contrary are all over.

For example, can anyone honestly say that the quality of life has improved, or has been much better, since Noynoy became President?

I’m not demanding for perfection or overnight results, people. All I’m looking for is TANGIBLE PROOF of improvement, and accomplishments.

Eighteen months in power isn’t so short a period to come up with even one achievement.
=====================
The Presidency of Benigno S. Aquino III began at noon on June 30, 2010, when he became the fifteenth President of the Philippines, succeeding Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo. Aquino is the third-youngest person to be elected president, and the fourth-youngest president after Emilio Aguinaldo, Ramon Magsaysay and Ferdinand Marcos.Aquino is the first president to be a bachelor, being unmarried and having no children.Aquino is the second president not to drink alcoholic beverages; the first president not to drink alcohol was Emilio Aguinaldo. Aquino is the eighth president to be a smoker.Aquino is the first graduate of Ateneo de Manila University to become president.Aquino is the third president who will only hold office in Malacañang Palace, but not be a resident, following Corazon Aquino and Fidel V. Ramos.Aquino is the first president to make Bahay Pangarap his official residence.Aquino is the third president to use his second given name, Simeon, as his middle initial, as Manuel L. Quezon and José P. Laurel did (like his grand father and father used his second name as well).Aquino is the second president to be a child of a former president, his mother was former President Corazon Aquino; the first president to be a child of a former president was President Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo, who is the daughter of former President Diosdado Macapagal.

$1 BILLION LOAN PLEDGE BY PHILIPPINES TO IMF







PEOPLE , WHAT ARE YOUR OPINIONS ON THIS!
PLEASE SHARE YOUR THOUGHTS….

ACCORDING TO MALACANANG:

The amount of money for poverty alleviation programs to benefit 3.8 million families is higher than the $1-billion the Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas is lending to the International Monetary Fund,
The $1 billion or P42 billion for IMF is a loan–charged with interest–and not a dole out, Lacierda noted. “We are not wasting the money. It’s a loan. IMF would pay us back the loan.”
The $1-billion loan is a thin slice from Bangko Sentral’s $77-billion gross international reserves,
Filipinos working in Europe would indirectly benefit from the loan, particularly those in the euro zone countries which borrowed money from IMF, Lacierda added.

TOTOO BA TALAGA BENEFITED ANG OFW NITO NA NAGWORK SA EUROPE?

==========================

ACCORDING TO SEN.MIRIAM SANTIAGO;

Senator Miriam Defensor-Santiago on Thursday hit critics of the $1-billion loan pledged by Philippines to the International Monetary Fund (IMF), which she described as constitutional.
Santiago said questions of legality being raised by some sectors against the IMF loan “have no basis” since the Constitution provides the President with the power to contract foreign loans on behalf of the country.
“Ang dami-daming pinagsasasabi pero hindi naman nagbabasa. The main problem with some of our politicians is that they are illiterate,” the senator said in a speech before members of the Credit Management Association of the Philippines.
Santiago particularly cited Article VII, Section 20 of the 1987 Constitution which states, “the President may contract or guarantee foreign loans on behalf of the Republic of the Philippines with the prior concurrence of the Monetary Board.”

==========================

***OPINION****

The Noynoy Administration finds it necessary to raise CCT (dole out to poor families) funds from 39.5B Pesos this year to 45B Pesos next year. This means only one thing, poverty is on the rise because he failed to address the root of the problem. He chose the more expensive "epoxy solution" just to silence the clamor of hard working Filipinos for meaningful jobs and he wants us to live in "fantasy land" by giving us and the international community the false impression that we are OK by lending out to the IMF 1B dollars. We had belt tightening measures in the past and we incurred a very dismal 3.5% GDP for doing so. We had a 22.8 Billion Peso budget deficit last May...almost half of the amount that is going to be loaned to IMF, so what now is going on in his head?

JESSE ROBREDO






Who’s LYING or who’s INCOMPETENT, or both, Robredo or Barcena?

As DILG boss, Robredo has supervisory power over the PNP. But take note of the following:

There’s NO CONFIRMED STORY yet on how Atyani and his two companions went missing. Robredo and other local and police officials consistently say the three were not taken by force or abducted.

But they have NOT YET PRESENTED ANY WITNESS who can prove that Atyani’s group indeed arrived on their own and unmolested at the supposed Abu Sayyaf camp they’re into now.

It has not been even proven beyond doubt by anyone that the supposed ‘general location’ of Atyani’s group, which military officials claim they already know, is their original destination in the first place.

All we have been hearing are the words of Robredo and police and military commanders with him.

Anybody correct me if I’m wrong.

But you know what’s both DESPICABE AND INTRIGUING with Robredo’s handling of the crisis, people?

His statement that no search-and-rescue operation would be launched by the police even if he himself says Atyani’s groiup are now being held hostage by Abu Sayyaf bandits, and that the government “will wait and see.”

ANONG KLASENG UTAK KAYA MERON SI ROBREDO?

When one is held hostage, that’s ILLEGAL DETENTION, A CRIMINAL ACT. Any criminal act, as in any, must be STOPPED AT ONCE, as in immediately, by police or other authorities with whatever means possible.

But Robredo would WAIT FIRST for WHATEVER it is and just let the criminal act, which HE HIMSELF REVEALED, to continue.

So if, God forbid, Atyani and or his companions are HARMED OR KILLED by the people holding them hostage, NOBODY else should be blamed but Robredo.
======================
President Benigno “Noynoy” Aquino III has appointed former Naga City Mayor Jesse Robredo to head the Department of Interior and Local Government.
Robredo, the only Filipino Mayor to have been conferred with the Ramon Magsaysay Award for Government Service, has been chosen to head the valuable post, said Executive Secretary Paquito Ochoa.
Robredo was first elected as Naga City Mayor in 1988, making him the youngest Philippine city mayor at age 29. Under his term, Naga was identified as one of the “Most Improved Cities in Asia” by Asiaweek Magazine in 1999.
Earlier this week, Aquino said he wants his DILG Secretary to have “synchronicity” with his vision, must have expertise in the local government and must have working knowledge with the Philippine National Police.
The DILG Secretary post had earlier been requested by Vice President Jejomar Binay.

PANFILO LACSON






Two dangerous signs are emerging from Pnoy’s plan to appoint Sen. Ping Lacson as anti-crime czar Department of Interior and Local Governments (DILG) secretary.

First: Pnoy is showing his VERY LITTLE REGARD for law and justice. In the process, he is highlighting his HYPOCRISY in his highly-publicized and supposed adherence to transparency.

We all know that Lacson returned to the country using documents authorities had branded as forged or fake after a year or so in hiding.

The use of fake or forged documents is ILLEGAL.

But Lacson was NEVER EVEN INVESTIGATED for it. Pnoy DIDN’T ORDER any agency to probe the issue. He NEVER ATTACKED Lacson despite his government’s endless proclamation that ‘no one is above the law.’

Lacson got away with it as if HE HAD NEVER DONE ANYTHING WRONG in the first place. And now, this early, Pnoy is seriously considering him to be anti-crime czar or DILG boss, the TOP IMPLEMENTOR of the law.

What ‘no one is above the law’ is Pnoy and his boys are talking about?

Obviously, for Pnoy, it’s what he wants or who he wants that matters. He doesn’t give a shit with questions on truth, transparency or the reputation of his choice.

That’s wisdom or maturity, guys, Pnoy style.

Second: If Lacson will get away TOTALLY with using questionable travel documents for his return, WHAT WILL STOP HIM from doing anything he wants, legal or not, once he’s named anti-crime czar or DILG secretary?

Add to this the following:

Up to now, Lacson HAS NOT SHOWN anything outstanding in his performance as a senator – no landmark bills authored and enacted into law, no admirable record in the number of bills filed, no infrastructure or pro-poor project.

The only thing Lacson is known for as a senator is his exposes of supposed illegal acts committed by or involving former President Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo and her husband Mike.

Of which he NEVER GOT TO PROVE any beyond reasonable doubt.

So what is our guarantee that he will render a better and truly impartial performance as anti-crime czar of DILG head?

===========================
Filipinos came to know him for his sterling and "no non-sense" leadership as Chief of the Philippine National Police.

As chief policymaker of the police organization, Senator Panfilo M. Lacson was responsible for the serious reforms in the PNP that had won the confidence of businessmen and foreign investors and the cooperation of the general public when he initiated closer coordination with other law enforcement agencies, here and abroad, in the fight against narcotics trafficking through supply constriction and demand reduction.

All of these were accomplished to bring back the old glory of the policeman.

The Filipino people rewarded Senator Lacson with a Senate seat in the May 2001 elections for his sterling performance as a public servant.

Born out of humble beginnings on June 1, 1948, in Imus, Cavite, Senator Lacson finished grade school at the Bayang Luma Elementary School and high school at the Imus Institute. Before he entered the PMA in 1967, he took up AB Philosophy at the Lyceum.

He carried the family name with pride and grew up to be a man of principles. His fascination with principles became more deeply embedded when he entered the PMA. He nourished these principles at the Philippine Constabulary, which he joined after graduating from the PMA.

He then joined the Philippine Constabulary - Integrated National Police Anti-Carnapping Task Force in 1986, and in 1988, be became the provincial commander of Isabela until 1989. That same year, he became provincial director of Laguna and held the post until July 1992.

As a legislator, Senator Lacson has learned fast and with certainty to carry the broad struggle of the Filipinos by heart. As a public servant, he has faithfully observed a personal credo - What is right must be kept right. What is wrong must be set right.

He primarily authored the Anti-Money Laundering Control Act of 2001, the Alternative Youth Training Course, an optional program for college students, and the Anti-Human Trafficking Act of 2001.

To date, Senator Lacson is working on legislation to fight the problem of terrorism through the passage of the Anti-Terrorism bill and to alleviate the condition of various sectors of society including students, contractual workers, barangay tanods, police, military and fire protection personnel.